1991 Chevrolet Camaro Reviews, Pricing & Specs















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Overview
The 1991 Camaro marked the return of the Z28, missing from the Camaro lineup since 1988. The fast ride promised by the Camaro may be a...
The 1991 Camaro marked the return of the Z28, missing from the Camaro lineup since 1988. The fast ride promised by the Camaro may be a relief for its passengers, none of whom seemed to find the 1991 model to be of acceptable comfort. Performance and acceleration are off-the-charts for this model, but passenger comfort, cargo room, and gas efficiency lag far behind. Of course, Camaro lovers love them for the thrill of the ride, not the thrill of conversation over the typically loud engine. Listening to the V8 roar can quickly cover up any whines of discomfort from one's person. There is another very rare option for the 1991. Well it really started in 1988, and did not start to catch on very well until 1989 and up. In 1991 in fact only 478 units (confirmed by GM)produced. It was/is known as the 1LE pachage. Here is what the 1991 version consisted of.Chevrolet built 478 Z28 Coupes with "1LE" equipment for 1991. As in 1989 and 1990, Ordering the RPO G80 Limited-slip rear axle & G92 RPO G92 triggered the build. RPO G92 required one of two engine combinations, the 305ci LB9 V8 with 5-speed manual, or the 350ci B2L V8 with 4-speed automatic transmission. When ordered with air conditionÃ?ÂÂing, RPO G92 ($466) included engine oil cooler, 4-wheel disc brakes (except for a brief period when 4-wheel discs were deleted with a $287 credit), and dual-converter exhaust. When ordered without air condiÃ?ÂÂtioning, RPO G92 ($675) added heavy-duty front brakes, aluminum driveshaft and spare wheel, special shocks and fuel pickup, and gas tank baffle. Fog lamps were deleted for weight savings and improved cooling. I will be posting a new forum for this package in a few days. Enjoy :) Terry
What owners say
"Overall, Camaro owners seem to love the car for its performance and fun driving experience, especially when it comes to acceleration and handling. Many drivers appreciate the unique style and classic appeal of the Camaro, particularly the convertible model. On the downside, some have expressed frustrations with reliability issues, such as frequent alternator replacements and poor gas mileage. The engine power can feel lacking for some models, especially with the smaller V6 variants."
I own one and in the process of turning it into a street\strip car. Its one of the first modern day modern muscle cars.
January 27, 2007A+ love taking this car out and stomping on all the import non sense. Fun in straights and even more fun in corners. Gas mileage sucks, but you don't buy this kind of car to be environmentally or economically friendly.
August 31, 2009I bought my '91 Chevrolet Camaro RS primarily as a commuter car that would get me to and from work quickly. (I had a bad habit of waking up late.) The performance of the V6 engine was adequate even though the Camaro was heavier than it should have been for a V6. The handling seemed loose; an upgrade to the tires, wheels, struts and springs were a necessity for high speed turns. OVERALL in stock form it was a good car, however upgrades were positively necessary for any kind of performance needed.
August 9, 2009What owners say
I own one and in the process of turning it into a street\strip car. Its one of the first modern day modern muscle cars.
January 27, 2007A+ love taking this car out and stomping on all the import non sense. Fun in straights and even more fun in corners. Gas mileage sucks, but you don't buy this kind of car to be environmentally or economically friendly.
August 31, 2009I bought my '91 Chevrolet Camaro RS primarily as a commuter car that would get me to and from work quickly. (I had a bad habit of waking up late.) The performance of the V6 engine was adequate even though the Camaro was heavier than it should have been for a V6. The handling seemed loose; an upgrade to the tires, wheels, struts and springs were a necessity for high speed turns. OVERALL in stock form it was a good car, however upgrades were positively necessary for any kind of performance needed.
August 9, 2009acceleration excellent, under powered braking, could be better, good handling characteristics considering size and weight, no major repairs needed, appearence is truely original definately suggests American Muscle, good gas mileage for V8 especially comparing to todays engines, not much difference, the car is fun to drive, still an eye catcher and there were not that many built so soon to be a true collectors/classic car. I would recommend this car to a friend. But it must be a convertible and a true Z28.
July 2, 2008T-tops automatic, high rise spoiler and hood blisters, brand new rebuilt 305 TPI, 4th gen LS1 aluminum driveshaft, black interior, ac delete, smog delete, headman shorty headers, 3" flowmaster exhaust, 16" chrome iroc z wheels with Cooper Zeon ZPT tires.
January 9, 2008There is nothing like dropping the top and taking my Camaro out for a ride on a nice Summer day.I had never even rode in a convertable before buying this car and now would consider buying another classic convertable.There are alot of 3rd gen Camaros out there ,but not alot of 3rd gen convertables in nice shape-at least around here in northern Ny state.I wish I could afford to do a complete paint job or total restore but since I cant,Im fixing it up one small job at a time.I have won a few trophies with it at local shows ,so I must be doing something right.Originality is I think ,what it has going for it most.The interior is sun faded from 22 years of sun but otherwise in top shape.Mechanically it is in great shape,and as of this writng has 76,000 miles on it.If the day comes that the engine is unrepairable- maybe then Ill drop a bigger engine in.I would like to keep it as original as possible until then.
July 28, 2013Performance wise I love the car, but it could be better. It needs more acceleration. Braking can and will be improved. It needs a serious paint job. Has some electrical problems, but nothing that can't be fixed. It's actually a V6, so gas is not a problem. The best part about it...I can supercharge or turbo it! TBI 3.1L V6, 220hp and 235 ft. lb.
July 27, 2008Performance - Quick Acceleration and Handling Build Quality - Excellent Condition, Has never seen Snow, partial to Rain. Appearance - Exterior is Mint condition with a black paintjob with Blue Pearl accents. Cost of Ownership - 88000 Miles with a fuel rating of 20mpg Fun Factor - Extremely Fun to drive in, Especially on a warm summer day.
June 26, 2008This is a great car, it has given me no trouble at all.
December 19, 2007Everyone likes the car, it's a true eye catcher and is a great classic, I have a V8 and still get 25mpg on the highway, And me and my dad had 3 corvettes at one time a 75',91',and a 96' collectors edition and this Camaro has just as much acceleration,braking,and handling as they ever had , but it just doesnt have the top speed.The only problem i have with it is the rattle with the convertible top and the small puff of smoke when i start it in the morning, but what camaro doesnt do that. My interior is still in great condition and the exterior has only one 4 inch spot with paint missing.The cost to own it has been very cheap so far only needed a fuel filter and an air filter , short of scheduled oil changes. And i couldn't pick a better car to handle the tight turns and fast acceleration for the price better than a 3rd Gen Camaro.And I would recommend this car to anyone,u just cant have mine.
January 16, 2009Trims & specs
Base MSRP $12,924 | Seating 4 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity N/A |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $15,914 | Seating 4 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity N/A |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $18,429 | Seating 4 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity N/A |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $21,284 | Seating 4 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity N/A |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |







